Ctrl+AI+Reg - 3 March 2025
Your shortcut to AI regulation, law and policy updates around the world.
AI Regulation Updates
In this issue:
Updates to EU x India, Japan, Singapore, EU, US, El Salvador.
Lawsuit update from India
Opinion on Japan’s and El Salvador’s respective AI bills, and how they reflect new creative methods to AI regulation, beyond the classic “risk based” approach.
See more on my Global AI Regulation Tracker (English version | Chinese version)
Global/Joint
🇪🇺 🇮🇳 [28 February 2025] EU and India sign joint statement to strengthen collaboration in AI: EU and India have adopted a joint statement following the Trade and Technology Council (TTC) second meeting. On AI specifically, EU and India (1) reiterated their commitment to safe, secure, trustworthy, human-centric, sustainable, and responsible AI; (2) agreed to deepen cooperation between the European AI Office and India AI Mission; (3) committed to joint projects focused on ethical and responsible AI frameworks. This builds on existing Research and Development (R&D) collaboration in high-performance computing applications related to natural hazards, climate change, and bioinformatics.
Asia
🇯🇵 [28 February 2025] Japan Cabinet approves national AI bill: It is reported that Japan's Cabinet has approved the Bill on the Promotion of Research and Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence-Related Technologies. Notable aspects of this AI bill include: (1) officially recognizing AI as a core driver of economic and social development, with a government-led AI Strategy Headquarters overseeing its implementation; (2) acknowledging risks like data leaks and misuse, but focusing on promoting transparency rather than imposing strict regulations; (3) supporting research institutions and businesses to bolster Japan's AI leadership and enhance international competitiveness; (4) emphasizing international cooperation, particularly in shaping global AI standards; and (5) requiring businesses utilizing AI to cooperate with government policies and investigations, with public "naming and shaming" as potential reputational consequence for non-cooperative businesses. The bill will now proceed to the National Diet for debate.